CPA vs. Affiliate Networks

Back in 2005 or so, many people trying to make money knew affiliate networks and affiliate programs. But barely anyone knew such thing called CPA network. It was mostly about affiliate marketing and selling someone else’s products online for a reward. But since then CPA networks have started popping up like blueberries in July. What’s so good about them? What’s the buzz? Let’s try to find out.

CPA versus Affiliate – Main Differences

CPA Network

  • Dedicated Account Manager

    You can ask questions, get help, get top products, stats, know where others are running the offers.

  • Mostly CPA/CPL offers.

    CPA means cost per action, CPL – cost per lead. Lots of no CC offers.

  • More flexible payments

    You can agree to be paid bi-weekly or weekly, or even daily.

  • Payout Bumps

    Ask for higher payout if you drive more leads and they’ll say yes.

  • Higher conversions

    As long as these are free offers.

  • Many offers in main verticals

    Diet, Finance, Dating, Education, Gaming – these are main verticals with dozens of different offers..

  • Anyone can run the offer

    You join you see the offer, you can run it. Sometimes you need approval, but those are easy from your affiliate manager.

  • Lots of volume for a few products

    As long as offers are in main verticals, big affiliates drive millions of dollars worth of traffic a month.

  • Pre-screened affiliates

    Affiliates get a call and then are approved or disapproved. Hard for new affiliates  who don’t have a proven track record.

  • Pre-screened advertisers

    Advertisers that are accepted have the money, and landing pages optimized for best results.

  • Only AM’s can access affiliates.

    Advertisers don’t know you. Affiliate manager will contact you.

Affiliate Network

  • You’re usually on your own

    No one to turn to. You can ask customer support, but they barely know anything and will not be as helpful.

  • Mostly CPS offers

    CPS – cost per sale. People need credit cards for these and you get % from sale.

  • It is what it is

    Usually 30/45-day payments. Only big affiliates can ask faster payments.

  • You Get the Regular

    In some cases, they don’t even have system in place to give different payouts.

  • Lower Conversions

    Paid offers always convert worse.

  • Few offers in many verticals

    Usually few offers in a vertical. Some advertisers can have 1000’s like ecommerce stores.

  • More Restrictions

    Some affiliates are auto-disapproved, because of region they live in. They have more traffic restrictions. 

  • Less volume, but more affiliates

    These guys get less traffic per offer, because they aren’t optimized so well, but make up for a number of advertisers.

  • Any affiliates can join

    Pretty much anyone can join. Only problems when you can’t run most of the offers you’ve found.

  • Any advertiser can join

    In these networks pretty much anyone can join and the network doesn’t take as much responsibility when it comes to payouts.

  • Merchants can access affiliates.

    Advertiser can email or IM you directly to discuss business.

Let’s be honest here. Despite all the differences, it’s pretty much the same thing. Affiliates join a network and get paid a commission for promoting products. So CPA networks are actually the same affiliate networks. Except they chose a slightly different direction. Going for more volume, more competitive verticals.

General rule of thumb. CPA network offers are more competitive. If you are established affiliate, you can make great money here. But new affiliates (if they even are accepted) will have hard time in these places. That’s why for starters I suggest nothing else, but a good product in regular affiliate network or joining an affiliate program directly.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>